technology to create the
satellite already exists, a more focused laser would be necessary, said Schulze-Makuch.
Sept. 30, 2010 -- Your choice of family pet may help determine whether your child develops eczema if he or she is at high risk.
In a newly published study, young children who were allergic to dogsand lived in homes with dogs had a lower risk for developing eczema than allergic children with no canine companions.
Children with cat allergies whose families had cats were far more likely to develop the chronic skin condition than allergic children living in homes with no cats.
Confused?
The simple take-home message is that dogs just might make better pets than cats if the goal is to lower an at-risk child’s chances of developing eczema, says lead researcher and University of Cincinnati assistant professor of medicine Tolly Epstein, MD.
“If your child is high risk due to a family history of asthma, allergies, or eczema, this may be something to consider,” she tells WebMD.
Between 10% and 20% of infants and young children develop eczema, a skin condition characterized by inflamed, itchy patches of skin. Like asthma and allergies, eczema is an atopic condition, meaning that it is closely linked to allergen hypersensitivity.
Family allergy history is a strong predictor of whether a young child will develop eczema. About one in four children whose mothers have allergies develop eczema, according to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America.
Allergic reactions to certain foods, especially eggs, are strong predictors of whether a child will develop eczema, but the impact of non-food allergens like pet hair is not well understood.
In the newly reported study, Epstein, co-author Grace K. LeMasters, PhD, and colleagues followed 636 children at high risk for developing asthma, allergies, or eczema from birth until after their fourth birthdays.
The children were enrolled in a larger, ongoing study examining the impact of air pollution on childhood allergies.
The children were tested for 17 different allergies annually from age 1 through age 4, and their parents completed yearly surveys.
When the researchers examined which children had developed eczema by age 4, they found that children who were allergic to dogs were less likely to develop the skin condition if they had a dog in the home during their first year of life.
Children with dog allergies who did not own dogs were four times more likely to develop eczema, compared to allergic children without dogs.
Compared to children living with dogs, children who tested positive for cat allergies after age 1 were 13 times more likely to develop eczema by age 4 if they lived with a cat in their first year of life.
Living with a dog was slightly protective for children who were not allergic to them, although the impact was not statistically significant.
It is not clear why having a dog in the home may protect at-risk children from developing eczema.
Earlier findings from the same study showed dog ownership to be associated with less wheezing during infancy.
The thinking then was that the outcome supported the so-called "hygiene hypothesis," which holds that exposure to germs early in life protects against allergic disease later on.
But Epstein says the latest analysis suggests something more may be going on.
The researchers measured levels of the allergy-inducing components of dust, known as endotoxins, in the children’s homes and found the protective effect of dog ownership to be independent of these levels.
Pediatric allergy specialist and researcher Dale Umetsu, MD, PhD, calls the study ‘intriguing,’ but he says more study is needed to confirm the findings.
Umetsu is a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a physician at Children’s Hospital Boston.
“Having dogs in the home very early in life may have some benefits for at-risk children, but I would not say this study alone proves this,” he says.
He points out the study and others examining the effect of pet ownership on allergic disease have focused on exposure in the first year of life.
“In our clinic, we see older children who already have asthma or eczema,” he says. “At this point, if there is a pet in the home and the child is allergic that tends to cause more problems.”
Traveling at 415km/h, Shanghai’s latest bullet train has smashed the previous record held by the country last year, by 21km/h. It services the Shanghai to Hangzhou route, which are about 202km apart.
It may be super speedy, but according to locals it’s going to be super pricey too, with the fares costing double what normal trains cost. But what price is getting to the destination in half the time it normally would take? Seemingly, 100 Yuan (about $US15) for a first-class ticket. Sounds like chips to us, but apparently a fare on the slower train is around $US7 in price—a much more palatable price.
Commuters must wait until late October, which is when the new line will open, and when women standing on train platforms with wet hair will suddenly feel the whoosh of a train whizzing past, drying them out. [IB Times via PopSci]
"Today Facebook begins rolling out multiple improvements to its photos product. Users will be able to upload and download high resolution photos, quickly view photos in a pop-up light box view without leaving the page they are currently viewing, utilize two bulk tagging features to tag one person in multiple photos simultaneously, and use a streamlined and more reliable Flash uploading tool. Despite the monetary cost, Facebook has made the changes to keep the world’s most popular photos product technologically competitive.
Five months ago Facebook acquired photo sharing startup Divvyshot, who’s founder Sam Odio product managed these changes. Odio tells us “We took a fresh look at the photos product, built a new vision, and this is first step towards that vision. Facebook is building out a larger photos team, photos are becoming a priority within the company, and it’s something we felt like we should be doing for our users.” The new changes will only go live for a small random subset of users later today because of the 100 million photos Facebook takes in a day. However, barring any significant problems, the changes will be rolled out to 100% of the user base over the next few weeks.
Users will now have the option to upload photos at 2048 pixels along the largest side as well as Facebook’s standard 720 pixels. This 8 times improvement in quality will cover the resolution of photos taken by most consumer cameras. Larger photos, such as those shot with DSLRs, will be re-sized down to 2048 pixels, or roughly 6000 kilobytes, on the user’s side just before the upload occurs. This means that if you try to upload a 6 megabyte photo, you won’t have to wait for that large file to be sent to Facebook. Users will still have to be patient, however, as the uploader notes high resolution photos take up to 10 times longer to upload.
Anyone will be able to view the print quality, high resolution photos on Facebook’s web interface, and there will be a link below them to initiate a download of a .jpg of the photo. The high resolution will allows users to print 5×7 inch photos at 300 DPI, or perhaps even 8x10s, without any degradation of the image. High resolution photos will also be available through the API, opening opportunities for print products, and high resolution photo experiences on HD televisions. Odio says he’s excited to see what the API partners come up with.
Facebook will still be using its Haystack storage infrastructure for high resolution photos. The significant drop in storage costs over the last five years makes the high resolution feasible, but it will still cost millions of dollars. Odio says, “Zuckberg made the decision. He though users would appreciate high resolution. He looked at the tab and said ‘Let’s do it.’” Odio explained that all the other major photo sharing sites offer high resolution, including Divvyshot, and while Facebook had previously been focused on sharing memories, not pixels, Facebook is ready to “get with the times”.
Soon, you will be able to click a photo anywhere on site, on the news feed or within albums, and the photo will load over a darkened background of the content you were viewing. You can then browse to adjacent photos, or click out or hit escape to close the light box and resume viewing the page you were previously looking at. The view will also include comments and Likes below the photo, only one advertisement instead of two, and the total amount of other text and distracting graphics will be minimal.
Light box view will also help photos load faster. Instead of sending a get http request for a whole new page which would have to be generated by the server and sent back, now Facebook will just construct the light box over your current page and immediately start downloading the image. The image may appear first, followed by the comments and Likes a tiny fraction of a second later.
The change should help users keep their desktops tidy. Previously when users wanted to retain their place in Facebook but view a photo, they would typically load the photo in a new tab. Odio say, “This seemed like a clumsy experience. The funny thing is that everyone is tracking page views. This change will probably cause a significant hit to page views, but we but we think it’s better. It loads much faster and you don’t lose your context in the content you were interested in.”
When you go to any album page, you’ll be able to click “Tag photo”, enter a friend’s name, click the face of that friend in multiple photo thumbnails, and hit save to simultaneously tag that person in all of those photos. “People were doing an incredible amount of tagging, but it seemed like a terrible user experience to have to tag each individual photo separately”. Odio says it might sound difficult to pinpoint faces in thumbnails, but it’s actually quite easy.
The original uploader of photos will have access to an express bulk tagging system. Facebook will recognize the same face being present in multiple photos, and temporarily the group photos with the same face together making it easy to tag that person in all those photos simultaneously. This should alleviate uploader tagging fatigue, which frequently resulted in users leaving their friends to tag themselves.
Facebook is implementing a new Flash uploader which increases reliability and takes advantage of the greater market penetration of Flash. Facebook has experimented with Java clients and browser plugins over the years, but rewrote the uploader in Flash for its ability to select multiple photos at once. The upload flow has also been streamlined. When you hit “upload photos” you’ll immediately begin selecting photos, and not be first asked to create and name an album as you were before.
Reliability is measured by how many users who at first click “upload” actually end up with new photos appearing on the site. Facebook expects at 5-10% increase in reliability thanks to the Flash uploader and streamlined flow. While users in the US with modern computers and fast connections might not see much difference, users in countries like Indonesia with older computers and worse connections will have a much improved upload experience.
"