Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Reprogrammed Cells Dramatically Wipe Out Leukemia

Patchwork receptors target immune cells against cancer.
Nature
 By Heidi Ledford of Nature magazine
 Two weeks after receiving an experimental treatment for his cancer, David Porter's 65-year-old leukemia patient seemed to take a turn for the worse. Fatigue and fever drove the patient back to hospital, where his temperature surged to more than 39ยบ C and he began to shake, his body racked with nausea and diarrhea.
 
 But rather than being a clinical failure, the patient's return to hospital heralded the treatment's success. His symptoms were the dying scream of more than a kilogram of leukemia cells under attack by genetically engineered immune cells called T cells that Porter, an oncologist at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center in Philadelphia, and his colleagues had infused two weeks earlier. As the T cells destroyed their targets, the sheer volume of cellular debris temporarily overwhelmed the patient's body.
 
 "I was sure the war was on," the patient, who has asked to remain anonymous, wrote in a statement released to reporters. "It was another week later that I got the news that my bone marrow was completely free of detectable disease."The dramatic results from this patient and two others, published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine and Science Translational Medicine, are among the first successes for a long-sought therapy based on reprogramming immune cells to attack cancers.
 
 The approach aims to harness the lethal capabilities of T cells. Porter and his colleagues, including immunologist Carl June, engineered each patient's T cells to recognize a protein called CD19 that is displayed on the surface of cancerous cells as well as on normal immune cells called B cells.
 
 Researchers have long sought to kill cancer with T cells containing such "chimeric antigen receptors", but early results were disappointing. Then, last year, the field was rocked by the reports of two deaths in clinical trials of similar therapies.
 
 Advocates of the technique hope that Porter's results and others like them will spark a renaissance. "These are very encouraging findings," says Michel Sadelain, a cancer researcher at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. "It really vindicates this small but growing field of cancer researchers who believe that cells are very smart drugs."
 
 Promising leads
 Cells may be smart, but researchers have struggled to harness that intelligence to fight cancer. Early attempts to engineer T cells with chimeric antigen receptors failed to coax the cells to proliferate in the body. As a result, the modified cells soon died off, leaving little impact on the disease.
 
 Porter's group is one the first to report results from a generation of chimeric receptors that include both an antibody to target the cancer and part of a receptor that amplifies the T-cell response. This time, the doctored T cells proliferated more than 1,000-fold in the body, and were still present at high levels six months after the treatment.
 
 June credits this expansion and persistence for the study's dramatic results: two patients in complete remission and a third showing a partial response. The treatment kills off normal antibody-producing B cells too, but patients can be given regular infusions of antibodies to compensate for this, Porter says.
 
 Other laboratories have also reported success with this generation of receptors. Last year, Steven Rosenberg's group at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland, published a similarly promising case report: a person with lymphoma given T cells modified to target CD19 experienced a partial remission of his cancer. That patient, treated initially in 2009, received a second treatment in March 2010 and is "still having a fabulous response", says Rosenberg.
 
 Safety first
 Rosenberg's team has since treated six more patients with lymphoma or leukemia, and the NCI plans to sponsor chimeric antigen receptor trials against pancreatic cancer, brain tumours called glioblastomas and a rare lung cancer called mesothelioma.
 
 Meanwhile, results from Sadelain's trial of CD19-targeting T cells in nine patients are due to be published soon, and Robert Hawkins, a cancer researcher at the University of Manchester, UK, says that his team is in the midst of a CD19 trial that is showing "encouraging" results.
 
 All these trials are small, and the results, although promising, are preliminary. That means the field still needs to come to grips with the potential toxicity of such treatments, cautions Walter Urba, an oncologist at the Providence Cancer Center in Portland, Oregon.
 
 In the wake of the case reports describing the deaths of the two clinical trial participants last year3,4, some trials were put on hold, and the US Food and Drug Administration convened a meeting to discuss the need for added safety measures. 
 
 "That really set the field back," says John Maher, a clinical immunologist at King's College London. "But the recent results are great news."
 As for Porter's patient; he is still marvelling over his experience. "When I was a young scientist, like many I'm sure, I dreamed that I might make a discovery that would make a difference to mankind," he wrote. "I never imagined I would be part of the experiment."
 
 This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on August 10, 2011.

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Huge Group of Polar Dinosaur Tracks Discovered in Australia

Huge Group of Polar Dinosaur Tracks Discovered in Australia: "


The discovery of a group of more than 20 three-toed dinosaur tracks in Australia is the largest and best-preserved collection of polar dinosaur tracks found in the Southern Hemisphere.

The tracks were found on the rocky coast of Victoria, Australia, in rocks that are around 105 million years old, paleontologists report in the journal Alcheringa Aug. 9.

Dinosaurs thrived in the area 115–105 million years ago when Australia was connected to Antarctica; the creatures spent months of the year roaming in polar darkness. Paleontologists believe the newly discovered tracks, found in sandstone blocks on Milanesia Beach in Great Otway National Park, were made on a flood plain in the summer, after the polar ice had melted and washed into the river valley. The sandstone also contains ripple marks and traces of insect burrows, common features of flood plains.

“These tracks provide us with a direct indicator of how these dinosaurs were interacting with the polar ecosystems, during an important time in geological history,” said Anthony Martin, Emory University paleontologist and research leader in a press release.



Three different sizes of small theropods, spanning from the size of a chicken to large crane, left the markings. Theropods were bipedal, mostly carnivorous dinosaurs that are ancestors of modern birds.

“The small, medium and large tracks may have been made by three different species,” said Martin. “They could also belong to two genders and a juvenile of one species,­ a little dinosaur family,­ but that’s purely speculative.”



Image: Anthony Martin/Emory University. Video: Emory University.

"

Perseid Meteor Shower Peaks Friday, But Watch Wednesday Morn

Perseid Meteor Shower Peaks Friday, But Watch Wednesday Morn: "


To catch the best view of a prolific meteor shower, scrap your plans tonight and get to bed for an early morning tomorrow.

The Perseid meteor shower sprinkles Earth with cometary dust every year from July to August. This year the event peaks the mornings of Aug. 12 and 13 around 2 a.m. local time for northern stargazers and 6 a.m. for those in the Southern Hemisphere.

But there’s a problem: The full moon waxes this weekend.



Theoretically, stargazers can catch between 50 and 80 shooting stars per hour from the darkest and most remote viewing locations. The full moon, however, will rise at dusk and set near dawn through the Perseids’ peak. The bright light will obscure most cometary debris that happens to streak through Earth’s thick atmosphere as meteors.

To get the best view, plan for a very early rise tomorrow, just after the moon sets. For most stargazers, the moon will sink below the horizon around 3 a.m. local time. (Check the exact moonrise and moonset time in your location with a simple calculator.)

The rate of meteors won’t be as good as during the peak this weekend, but lucky observers in dark skies should still see around 20 per hour. Northern observers should look to the northeast in the constellation Perseus. Southern observers will need to wait very close to dawn to see the shower on top of the northern horizon.

Comet Swift-Tuttle left behind the trail of debris that Earth sweeps through each year to create the Perseids.

As cometary particles begin entering ever-thicker regions of Earth’s atmosphere — between 45 and 60 miles up — they compress air in front, heat up and disintegrate into bright glowing trails. The particles range in size from grains of sand to small boulders, the latter being much less common.

If any readers out there take photos of the meteor shower this week, Wired Science would love to see and share them! Send full-resolution photos (or a link to them) and a credit to dave_mosher@wired.com and make the subject line includes the words “meteor shower.”

Image: Adcuz/Flickr

See Also:

"

Monday, August 8, 2011

Exercise a 'Wonder Drug' for Cancer Survival

Physical Activity Aids Recovery and long-Term Health of Cancer Survivors, Report Shows
Woman after exercise with towel around neck

Aug. 8, 2011 -- Cancer patients can reduce the risks of side effects and cancer recurrence by exercising regularly, a new report shows.
The report, "Move More: Physical activity the underrated 'wonder drug,'"from Macmillan Cancer Support in the U.K., says that 150 minutes of moderate intensity activity per week, the amount recommended by the U.K.'s four chief medical officers, is the minimum amount required to see the benefits.
Moderate intensity activity includes exercise such as cycling and very brisk walking, but also household tasks such as heavy cleaning and mowing the lawn.
The report presents four key findings:
  1. Breast cancer patients' risk of recurrence and of dying from the disease can be reduced by up to 40% by doing 150 minutes of moderate intensity activity per week.
  2. Bowel cancer patients' risk of recurrence and dying from the disease can be reduced by up to 50% by doing significant amounts of physical activity; this means about six hours of moderate intensity physical activity per week.
  3. Prostate cancer patients' risk of dying from the disease can be reduced by up to 30% by doing the recommended 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity.
After treatment, all cancer patients can reduce their risk of side effects from cancer and its treatment, including fatigue, depression, osteoporosis, and heart disease, by doing the recommended levels of physical activity.

Many Health Professionals Unaware of Benefits

However, despite strong emerging evidence that being physically active could dramatically improve cancer patients' recovery and long-term health, a Macmillan online survey of 400 health professionals who deal with cancer patients found that many are not aware of this and most are not talking to their patients about it. Over half of the primary care doctors, nurses, and oncologists surveyed do not speak to their cancer patients about the benefits of physical activity, or at best they speak to just a few of them.
Ciaran Devane, chief executive of Macmillan Cancer Support, says, "Cancer patients would be shocked if they knew just how much benefit physical activity could have on their recovery and long-term health, in some cases reducing their chances of having to go through the grueling ordeal of treatment all over again."

Exercise Not Just an Add-on to Care

According to Jane Maher, chief medical officer of Macmillan Cancer Support, "The advice I would previously have given to one of my patients would have been to 'take it easy.' This has now changed significantly because of the recognition that, if physical exercise were a drug, it would be hitting the headlines. There really needs to be a cultural change so that health professionals see physical activity as an integral part of cancer after-care, not just an optional add-on."

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Is Our Moon Actually Two Moons That Smashed Into Each Other?

Is Our Moon Actually Two Moons That Smashed Into Each Other?: "


Some scientists are starting to believe that our moon is actually the result of a mid-air space collision of two moons. They say that the two-moon theory could explain why each side of the moon is so different from the other.

It’s widely accepted that the moon was created when a Mars-sized body hit Earth which blasted material that would eventually form the moon into space. This conveniently explains the differences between the moon and Earth. However! The differences between the near side of the moon and the far side (or dark of the moon) can’t be neatly explained in this theory. That’s why scientists believe that a smaller, littler moon had also existed after the Mars-sized body hit the Earth. The little moon and real moon co-existed peacefully until the smaller moon was pulled from its orbit and smashed into real moon, creating our moon. Moons, moons, moons!

Specifically, the scientists say that the “companion moon, 1/3 the diameter of the Moon, striking at subsonic velocity, does not form a crater. The impact produces an accretionary pile rather than a crater.” That means most of the material from little moon would have stayed on one side, like while the material of the original moon stayed on the other side. Two moons, moon smash, our moon. [Nature, Space, Ars Technica]